ACLeathercraft wrote:It is interesting to note that 2 of us replied to your post, offered advice and encouragement, both of which take time, yet you did not acknowledge that courtesy but rather continued with your personal gripe about how KS relate information.
Treat others as you like to be treated yourself.
Ignore others - maybe others will ignore you too. Maybe here lies the answers.
Just a thought.
It definitely wasn't my intention to be rude, and I wasn't ignoring. I crafted my response based on the reply posts I had received. It is clear to me that I am not well enough versed in forum etiquette to respond in a way that doesn't clutter a forum with excessive quotes, replies to several people at once, and doesn't unintentionally offend. I'm trying to do it again, this time with quotes so that it is clearer that I did read and react to reply posts. My apologies in advance for the excessive lenght of this post. This is actually the first forum I've every really participated on and I apologize that you feel I have ignored you, ACLeathercraft, especially since that is not the actuality of the situation. It was also not my intention to offend you. I'm still trying to get a hang of the quoting system. I ask that you please be patient with me. I'm not here to gripe. I actually saw that no one had yet addressed the question of backers cancelling (here or on other places that I read about Kickstarter projects) and thought that it might be a helpful topic of conversation for another new project creator later on. I'm not demoralized or upset about losing backers; just curious.
ACLeathercraft wrote: When you cancel a pledge, KS does ask you why you are cancelling but I guess from what you are saying that this information does not come back to the creator. I told the creator my reason for pulling the pledge and I am sure most people would tell you.
"It is a shame that Kickstarter is not passing that information they are collecting on the project creators." was directed at ACLeathercraft, for the information that Kickstarter does ask why a backer may cancel a pledge. Also, the explanation as to why I'm not messaging the former backers about this: "I felt that the level of difficulty might be an indicator that Kickstarter didn't want me contacting them." Especially with the knowledge that ACLeathercraft provided that Kickstarter already collects data on cancellations, I really don't want to harass anyone who chose to leave my project. After I explored Kickstarter enough to find a way to ask for feedback, I realized just how stalker-like it made me feel to do so.
The above section was also directed at inflexionUSA when he asked:
inflexionUSA wrote:Have you asked them directly?
The key is to stay engaged with your backers with thoughtful and meaningful dialog. Do it with updates, but also with private messages and keep it personal.
This part was also in direct response to inflexionUSA's questions: "I get the impression that I am much more communicative than most of my backers. I know Kickstarter tells you be engaged but I think that has to be balanced with not being too pushy. I have quite a lot of backers that haven't answered the direct, simple question I asked when they first joined up about what color they'd most like to see made available." Asking what colors each backer hoped to see was the most meaningful, personal thing I could think to ask my backers individually without asking personal questions unrelated to the project.
I didn't reply directly to the following statements. I am inferring from the quote at the very top of this reply that perhaps I should have. So, I'll respond to it now.
sbriggman wrote:Interesting. I've had one or two people talk about that. It can also happen the other way - I was a backer for a campaign where they kept sending updates in the final hours for people to consider raising their pledge and they ended up being funded.
Thanks.
ACLeathercraft wrote:Don't take it to heart - I am sure you will continue to be successful and that this was just a glitch
![Smile :)](https://www.kickstarterforum.org/images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Thank you for your response, but I am not looking for emotional support. I am looking for data in the form of answers to the questions presented in the thread.
inflexionUSA wrote:It’s hard to say, people change their minds for all sorts of reasons. Did this happen after you were funded? Perhaps helping to get you funded was their primary objective.
This one, I actually missed. (My apologies, inflexionUSA.) The cancelled pledges do not seem to directly correlate to the level of funding. They are fairly consistent across the project as a slow trickle of people leaving. If I had lost several at once, I would immediately suspect that it was something I had done or not done and investigate that as much as possible. No one backed out right after either our initial goal or first stretch goal was achieved, but I did have one just before either of those goals were met. It is still entirely possible that the backers were leaving because they realized we were close enough to the goal that we might still make it without them. I'm still not sure.
Again, if I offended anyone, I offer my apologies. Like I said, I'm new to the forum experience. While I appreciate feedback about rules of etiquette, I don't believe that this thread is the appropriate place for said feedback. If anyone else would like to help relieve me of my forum etiquette naivety, I simply ask that they do so over message instead of further diluting this thread from the initial intent. Thank you in advance for your thread relevant responses.
While I definitely value the feedback from others who have responded, my original questions still stand. I'm hoping to learn from other project creators if backers cancelling pledges is something that they have experienced. While backer information is useful, it is different from what I was hoping this thread would add to this forum. If other creators out there experience minimal backer cancellation as a somewhat normal phenomenon, then project creators should be aware of that situation and take that into account while planning and funding their own projects. If it is not a normal phenomenon for most project creators, then it means that projects where this does occur may want to expend a bit more energy trying to find out why.