You should be careful about what you wish for, as you might well receive it (i.e.: your assertion that what you "need" is an official review).
I took you up on your invitation to read your posting that started this thread. I followed that up by accepting your invitation to look at your KickStarter page for this project. That said, I don't agree with several of the assertions that you made.
Your assertion that your KickStarter page is one of the best-looking, funnest project pages ever conceived is mere opinion, not established fact. Even at that, it is your opinion, and not necessarily anyone else's. That you then follow such a bold assertion up by declaring that it isn't boasting on your part flies directly in the face of the obvious - that it is, indeed, boasting on your part.
Let us assume that you're right, though - that your KickStarter page is one of the best-looking, funnest project pages ever conceived. Then, if that is the case, why are you now lamenting about this very same project is currently running into the ground?
It is worth taking cognizance of the fact that an idea conceived is not the exact, same thing as an idea executed. If that which has been conceived is not the problem, then what does that leave but the execution, or perhaps the marketing.
It must take a special kind of talent to take one of the best-looking, funnest KickStarter project pages ever conceived by the human mind, and run it into the ground. So, who is responsible for running such a sterling concept into the ground? It's your project, right, Davy? So, where - exactly does the buck stop with this project? With you, or with someone else?
Of course, you also asserted that you did everything right. Yet, your project is running into the ground? If you did everything right, and I mean every last thing, then all the more special a talent it must be, to take one of the best-looking, funnest project pages ever conceived, and do everything right, but then still run all of that goodness right into the ground. Plus, to make matters even worse, you've managed to take a project that has been named a KickStarter staff pick, of all things, and run it into the ground, after such a promising start. Yet, you did everything right?
But, further down your chronicle of lamentation that is this discussion thread, you then unilaterally declare that KickStarter is the problem, by virtue of it being what you characterize as "an elite club." Well, if you know that it is an elite club, why did you create a KickStarter project page in the first place? Were you simply gullible, or did it take you a long time to come to that conclusion.
Of course, when one contemplates that another guy tried to use KickStarter to raise a measly ten dollars, just so that he could make some potato salad, but then at last count he had over six thousand backers pledging more than fifty-two thousand dollars to support his project, that pretty much guts your claim that KickStarter is an elite club. Ten dollar project goals hardly evidence an elite club.
To make matters even worse (can they get worse??), you have 100% confidence in the product that you created. Which begs the question why you're now going all sour grapes about the project page that you created for it resulting in it running into the ground. Now, let me get this right, Davy - KickStarter gave you wide latitude in creating your project page, but you managed to come up with a page that is now running into the ground? But, none of it is your fault? Just who - exactly and specifically - constitutes this "elite club" of which you now complain?
I will accept at face value your claim that you labored intensely for eight straight months making Neon City Rumble a reality. No, wait! You called it something else. What was it? Oh, I recall, now. You chose to call it N30N City Rumble, instead of Neon City Rumble.
But, your preference for gimmickry in naming the project aside, you spent two-thirds of one year laboring intensely to make this card game a reality. I've read of some who have spent far longer than that preparing to launch a KickStarter project. But, that aside, I am also willing to accept at face value that you previously had a shitty day job. There's certainly nothing wrong with quitting jobs that are shitty, be they day jobs or otherwise. You chose to pursue a dream. That's commendable - but, it's not without risk. Life, kind of like launching a KickStarter project page, comes with risk as a natural attachment and solid possibility.
Without even getting into the details of statistical data that speak to the sheer number of KickStarter successes versus failures, if you did everything right, then why did your four hundred dollars in advertising net you not a single pledge? Was the mysterious elite club of which you complain also responsible for creating the ads, or for selecting where you had those ads run?
I go to the trouble of posting all of this, not to beat you over the head with your lack of supporting logic, Davy, but to raise the possibility for consideration that you might just be too emotionally attached to your own project, and that your emotional attachment might - just might - be clouding your objectivity, which in turn just might be skewering your judgment. There's a reason why no man should be judge in his own case.
Personally, and this is just my opinion of one, mind you, I think that your assessment of this project is flawed. I think that some of the images on your KickStarter project page look really nice, but that there are quite a few that are taking the shine off of an otherwise promising project.
I'm far from a hyper-fan of neon images, although I love neon lights. Yet, after clicking on that Wilde Rudy image and exploring Darkdux's deviantArt gallery a bit, I quickly became convinced that your chosen approach to incorporating images into your KickStarter project page is undermining your ability to achieve the desired level of wow factor with page visitors.
Part of your project page's images have an EGA or even a CGA feel to them, as I sit and look them over, comparing them to one another.
The following image looks pretty doggone nice, Davy:
http://darkdux.deviantart.com/art/N30N- ... -469966149I connect with it, visually. In other words, it has a lot of visual impact with me.
Yet, someone (perhaps that mysterious KickStarter elite club), opted to take this image, and shrink it down considerably, before incorporating it onto your KickStarter page. In the process, it lost the vast majority of its visual impact.
But, then again, what do I know? After all, I'm just some guy passing through this forum, offering an opinion in an off-the-cuff manner.
The reason that things fell off for you, pledge-wise, on Day 5 is likely due to new projects being created on KickStarter, and them taking your project's place (along with numerous other KickStarter projects' places, as well), in KickStarter's project queue for announcing projects.
My understanding is that it's called the Dead Zone. I can't claim credit for coining that term, but I do believe that more than just your own project have been subjected to that phase of life in the KickStarter lane.
On a personal level, I have only backed a relative handful of KickStarter projects, to date. None of those pledges, however, have been at the whim or the behest of any elite club. Whether you believe me or not, though, I leave to you to decide.
Of course, if KickStarter is really and truly an elite club, why you, yourself, chose to back KickStarter projects no less than thirty-two times - almost three dozen times - remains an unexplained mystery, in and of itself. For a guy who has done everything right on his own KickStarter project, it sure seems odd that it would take you thirty-two times of backing projects, before you figure out that KickStarter is an elite club.
Either you were really slow on the take, where figuring out that KickStarter is an elite club, or you are simply wrong in your assertion that it is an elite club.
For some reason, your posting made me recall something that actress Jodie Foster said in the movie, Contact, which I watched a few years back. In it, she said:
"Occam's Razor - It's a basic scientific principle, and it says, all things being equal, the simplest explanation tends to be the right one."
If you truly believe that you've done everything right, where this project page is concerned, then belaboring the point of taking issue with your assertions would serve no useful purpose.
In any event, I wish you well with your project, Davy. Becoming negative about KickStarter would be a poor substitute for remaining positive about your own project and its chances for success.
Take care,
- Charles -