Basically, I try to figure out what's wrong, to unearth areas of weakness of deficiencies, so to speak, and I comment on project pages, which is where the articulation part comes in. For many project creators, I think that they are either just so busy, or just so new to it all, that they miss or overlook some fairly fundamental things.
I think that project creators, man of them, anyway, are in need of both mentorship and assistance. Obviously, no one really wants to invest time and energy in a project that goes nowhere. Project creators want to meet the funding goals that they set, at a bare minimum.
So, how do you create something like that for a near-infinite variety of different project types? Even assuming that it can be done, how much time and energy and expense is required, in order to accomplish such? Furthermore, even assuming that one can create such a thing or process, how many projects can it handle within a given amount of time
If somebody is tweeting project after project after project, day in and day out, week in and week out, month in and month out, year in and year out, how does that not get old to the people reading those tweets?
To me, it all boils down to quality. People want quality connections with quality audiences.
people allow themselves to fall into the trap of thinking that they simply need to mimic what other projects have done, in order to strike gold with their crowd funding undertaking.
Yet, the actual reality is quite different form that, I think.
Andy_Sinclair wrote:Interesting discussion that I thought I would input:-
A useful resource - project creators are too close to their projects and sometimes can't see the 'woods for the trees' - in addition, friends try to be supportive, so are not as critical as they could be. An outside voice is very useful and I have used and found Charles to extremely helpful - and the adage 'cruel to be kind' springs to mind!
diynf wrote:You seem very informed though Charles so I would be curious to see what your project is, upon you writing it of course.-Sally
That aside, why do I strike you as being "very informed?" I think that that is a rather generous characterization - perhaps more than a bit too generous.
Andy_Sinclair wrote:
That aside, why do I strike you as being "very informed?" I think that that is a rather generous characterization - perhaps more than a bit too generous.
Stop being so humble
Charles wrote:Andy_Sinclair wrote:
That aside, why do I strike you as being "very informed?" I think that that is a rather generous characterization - perhaps more than a bit too generous.
Stop being so humble
It's not an exercise in humility. Salvador Briggman, now he's very informed on the subject of crowd funding. Me? I'm fairly new to it, and I wouldn't describe myself as very informed on the subject - certainly, not at this point in time, anyway.
I joined this forum on July 28th, 2014. That really wasn't all that long ago. So, not a lot of time has passed to enable me to school myself on the subject of crowd funding.
Charles wrote:
One of the things that I have decided to do, where the Making Tracks articles are concerned, is to draw from Kickstarter projects listed here in the KickstarterForum.Org forum. That way, it reduces the overall size of the pool from whence these particular category of articles are drawn, while simultaneously giving crowd funding project creators another reason to post here in this forum of Salvador Briggman's.
Andy_Sinclair wrote:Nice idea! I think that it is important that we put something back into Sal's site given the huge amount of useful crowd-funding information there is on Crowdcrux.
Andy
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests
Copyright © 2021 Salvador Briggman LLC. All Rights Reserved. Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited.